Lecture from: 17.04.2024 | Video: Video ETHZ

Review: Accumulation Points

We’ve talked about accumulation points (or limit points) of a set . Think of these as points that points in can “crowd around.” Formally, (which could be a real number, , or ) is an accumulation point if you can find a sequence of points within (but not itself) that marches steadily towards .

Intuition: If is an accumulation point, you can get arbitrarily close to using points from that are distinct from . It’s not just about being in ; it’s about having points “infinitesimally near” .

Reformulating Accumulation Points

  • For a real number : For any tiny distance you pick, the “punctured neighborhood” around – that’s the interval with itself removed – must contain some points from . In symbols: . (This matches Definition 3.10.1 in our script.)

  • When : No matter how large a number you choose, there must be points in that are even larger. So, .

  • When : Similarly, for any large negative number , there must be points in further to the left. So, .

Examples: Seeing Accumulation Points in Action

  • Example 1 (from Bsp. 3.10.2): Consider the set . This set consists of the single point and the open interval between and .

    The accumulation points of , let’s call this set , are all the points in the closed interval . Why? You can get arbitrarily close to any point in (including and themselves) using points from the open interval .

    Important Note: The point is not an accumulation point of . It’s an “isolated point” – there’s a little bubble around that contains no other points of .

  • Example 2: Take . This is the non-negative real line with the single point removed. The accumulation points are the entire interval and . You can approach any non-negative real number (including and ) with points from . And, for instance, the sequence (for , so ) is in and heads off to .

Definition: The Limit of a Function

Now, let’s talk about the limit of a function as approaches an accumulation point of . We say the limit is (where can be a real number, , or ) if the following holds: no matter how you pick a sequence of points in (excluding itself) that converges to , the corresponding sequence of function values must converge to .

Our shorthand: .

If we can’t find such a consistent (meaning different paths to give different limits, or doesn’t settle down at all), then we say the limit of as does not exist. (Though, if consistently goes to or , we often still say the “limit exists” in that extended sense.)

Examples: Limits in Practice

  • Consider for . As gets closer and closer to (from the left, since that’s our domain), gets closer and closer to . So, .

  • Let , defined on . To find , we only care about values of near but not equal to . For such (specifically ), . So, . Notice that the actual value is completely irrelevant for the limit!

  • Now, , defined on . What is ? If we approach with , . But if we approach with (and ), . Since we get different results depending on how we approach , the limit does not exist. (We’ll soon formalize this idea with one-sided limits.)

Remarks on Limits: Connecting to Epsilon-Delta and Continuity

Let and be an accumulation point of .

1. The Epsilon-Delta Viewpoint (for )

The limit (where is a real number) means: for any desired level of closeness to , you can find a small enough distance around such that for any in that’s within this -distance of (but not itself), will be within of .

Formally: .

Example: For and , the relevant neighborhood is .

(This is Definition 3.10.3 in our script.)

The Big Picture: There are possible scenarios for limits: can be finite, , or , and independently, the limit can also be finite, , or . Each has its own precise (or similar) formulation.

Example of another formulation: (for ) means: for any large negative number (with ), you can find a such that for all within of (but not ), will be even smaller than .

That is, .

Challenge yourself: Try to write down the precise definitions for the other 7 cases!

2. Limits and Continuity

If is actually in the domain of : The function is continuous at if and only if two things happen:

  1. The limit exists and is a finite real number.
  2. This limit is equal to the function’s value at , i.e., .

Example: Consider , defined on . Here, (because for near but not , ). However, . Since , the function is not continuous at .

What if isn’t in the domain? Continuous Extensions

If is not in , we can’t talk about being continuous at . But, if the limit does exist (and is finite), we can often “patch the hole” or “extend” the function. Define a new function : This is now defined at , and by construction, it is continuous at . We call the continuous extension of at .

Revisiting an earlier example: on . We found . The continuous extension to include is on .

3. The Familiar Limit Laws Still Hold

If are functions, and both and exist as finite real numbers, then:

  • Sum Rule:
  • Product Rule:

4. Order Preservation in Limits (Comparison)

If for all in (or at least in a punctured neighborhood of within ), and both limits exist, then:

5. The Squeeze Theorem (or Sandwich Lemma) - A Powerful Tool

Suppose you have three functions , , and such that for all in (or near ). If the “outer” functions and both approach the same limit as , then the “inner” function is squeezed between them and must also approach . That is, if and , then .

Example: The Important Limit

Let and . What happens as ?

Claim: .

Recall from Corollary 3.9.2: For , we established the inequality .

For (so is positive and non-zero), we can divide by : What about negative ? Since is an odd function () and is odd, their ratio is an even function: . So, the inequality actually holds for all .

Now, let’s look at the limits of the bounding functions as :

  • (polynomials are continuous).
  • .

Since is squeezed between two functions that both approach as , the Squeeze Theorem tells us:

A similar argument can be used to show that .

Theorem: Limit of Composite Functions

Let , and be an accumulation point of . Consider a function . Suppose the limit exists, and is in the domain . Now, if we have another function that is continuous at , then we can pass the limit through :

Proof Idea: This follows from the sequential definition of limits and the sequential definition of continuity. If (with ), then . Since is continuous at , .

Example: Applying the Composite Limit Theorem

Let’s find . Define . We just showed . Define . This function is continuous at (since ). Therefore,

One-Sided Limits: Approaching from Left or Right

Observation: Consider . As approaches , the behavior is drastically different depending on whether is positive (approaching from the right) or negative (approaching from the left).

Definition: One-Sided Accumulation Points

Let .

  • is a right-sided accumulation point of if is an accumulation point of the set (points in strictly to the right of ).
  • is a left-sided accumulation point of if is an accumulation point of (points in strictly to the left of ).

Definition: One-Sided Limits

Let , and be a real number, , or .

  • If is a right-sided accumulation point of , the right-sided limit of as approaches is , written , if is the limit of the function restricted to as .

  • If is a left-sided accumulation point of , the left-sided limit of as approaches is , written , if is the limit of the function restricted to as .

Sequential View: for every sequence in with for all and , we have . (And analogously for the left-sided limit with .)

Example: For :

Example: as

Consider . We claim .

Proof

Let be any sequence in such that as . We want to show that .

Pick any large positive number . We want to show for large enough.

Consider . Since implies (because is strictly increasing).

Since and , there must be an such that for all , we have .

For these , it follows that . Since was arbitrary, this means . Thus, .

Example: as for

Consider for , defined on . Then .

Reasoning: As , . Since , . Then , which we interpret as .

(Using the composite limit theorem: ).

Continuous Extension of

For , the function on has a limit of as . So, we can define a continuous extension to include :

This extended function is strictly monotonically increasing, bijective (if we consider the codomain ), and continuous on its entire domain .

Continue here: 16 Differentiation, Derivative and Rules