Lecture from: 17.04.2024 | Video: Video ETHZ
Review: Accumulation Points
We’ve talked about accumulation points (or limit points) of a set . Think of these as points that points in can “crowd around.” Formally, (which could be a real number, , or ) is an accumulation point if you can find a sequence of points within (but not itself) that marches steadily towards .
Intuition: If is an accumulation point, you can get arbitrarily close to using points from that are distinct from . It’s not just about being in ; it’s about having points “infinitesimally near” .
Reformulating Accumulation Points
-
For a real number : For any tiny distance you pick, the “punctured neighborhood” around – that’s the interval with itself removed – must contain some points from . In symbols: . (This matches Definition 3.10.1 in our script.)
-
When : No matter how large a number you choose, there must be points in that are even larger. So, .
-
When : Similarly, for any large negative number , there must be points in further to the left. So, .
Examples: Seeing Accumulation Points in Action
-
Example 1 (from Bsp. 3.10.2): Consider the set . This set consists of the single point and the open interval between and .
The accumulation points of , let’s call this set , are all the points in the closed interval . Why? You can get arbitrarily close to any point in (including and themselves) using points from the open interval .
Important Note: The point is not an accumulation point of . It’s an “isolated point” – there’s a little bubble around that contains no other points of .
-
Example 2: Take . This is the non-negative real line with the single point removed. The accumulation points are the entire interval and . You can approach any non-negative real number (including and ) with points from . And, for instance, the sequence (for , so ) is in and heads off to .
Definition: The Limit of a Function
Now, let’s talk about the limit of a function as approaches an accumulation point of . We say the limit is (where can be a real number, , or ) if the following holds: no matter how you pick a sequence of points in (excluding itself) that converges to , the corresponding sequence of function values must converge to .
Our shorthand: .
If we can’t find such a consistent (meaning different paths to give different limits, or doesn’t settle down at all), then we say the limit of as does not exist. (Though, if consistently goes to or , we often still say the “limit exists” in that extended sense.)
Examples: Limits in Practice
-
Consider for . As gets closer and closer to (from the left, since that’s our domain), gets closer and closer to . So, .
-
Let , defined on . To find , we only care about values of near but not equal to . For such (specifically ), . So, . Notice that the actual value is completely irrelevant for the limit!
-
Now, , defined on . What is ? If we approach with , . But if we approach with (and ), . Since we get different results depending on how we approach , the limit does not exist. (We’ll soon formalize this idea with one-sided limits.)
Remarks on Limits: Connecting to Epsilon-Delta and Continuity
Let and be an accumulation point of .
1. The Epsilon-Delta Viewpoint (for )
The limit (where is a real number) means: for any desired level of closeness to , you can find a small enough distance around such that for any in that’s within this -distance of (but not itself), will be within of .
Formally: .
Example: For and , the relevant neighborhood is .
(This is Definition 3.10.3 in our script.)
The Big Picture: There are possible scenarios for limits: can be finite, , or , and independently, the limit can also be finite, , or . Each has its own precise (or similar) formulation.
Example of another formulation: (for ) means: for any large negative number (with ), you can find a such that for all within of (but not ), will be even smaller than .
That is, .
Challenge yourself: Try to write down the precise definitions for the other 7 cases!
2. Limits and Continuity
If is actually in the domain of : The function is continuous at if and only if two things happen:
- The limit exists and is a finite real number.
- This limit is equal to the function’s value at , i.e., .
Example: Consider , defined on .
Here, (because for near but not , ).
However, . Since , the function is not continuous at .
What if isn’t in the domain? Continuous Extensions
If is not in , we can’t talk about being continuous at . But, if the limit does exist (and is finite), we can often “patch the hole” or “extend” the function. Define a new function : This is now defined at , and by construction, it is continuous at . We call the continuous extension of at .
Revisiting an earlier example: on . We found . The continuous extension to include is on .
3. The Familiar Limit Laws Still Hold
If are functions, and both and exist as finite real numbers, then:
- Sum Rule:
- Product Rule:
4. Order Preservation in Limits (Comparison)
If for all in (or at least in a punctured neighborhood of within ), and both limits exist, then:
5. The Squeeze Theorem (or Sandwich Lemma) - A Powerful Tool
Suppose you have three functions , , and such that for all in (or near ). If the “outer” functions and both approach the same limit as , then the “inner” function is squeezed between them and must also approach . That is, if and , then .
Example: The Important Limit
Let and . What happens as ?
Claim: .
Recall from Corollary 3.9.2: For , we established the inequality .
For (so is positive and non-zero), we can divide by : What about negative ? Since is an odd function () and is odd, their ratio is an even function: . So, the inequality actually holds for all .
Now, let’s look at the limits of the bounding functions as :
- (polynomials are continuous).
- .
Since is squeezed between two functions that both approach as , the Squeeze Theorem tells us:
A similar argument can be used to show that .
Theorem: Limit of Composite Functions
Let , and be an accumulation point of . Consider a function . Suppose the limit exists, and is in the domain . Now, if we have another function that is continuous at , then we can pass the limit through :
Proof Idea: This follows from the sequential definition of limits and the sequential definition of continuity. If (with ), then . Since is continuous at , .
Example: Applying the Composite Limit Theorem
Let’s find . Define . We just showed . Define . This function is continuous at (since ). Therefore,
One-Sided Limits: Approaching from Left or Right
Observation: Consider . As approaches , the behavior is drastically different depending on whether is positive (approaching from the right) or negative (approaching from the left).
Definition: One-Sided Accumulation Points
Let .
- is a right-sided accumulation point of if is an accumulation point of the set (points in strictly to the right of ).
- is a left-sided accumulation point of if is an accumulation point of (points in strictly to the left of ).
Definition: One-Sided Limits
Let , and be a real number, , or .
-
If is a right-sided accumulation point of , the right-sided limit of as approaches is , written , if is the limit of the function restricted to as .
-
If is a left-sided accumulation point of , the left-sided limit of as approaches is , written , if is the limit of the function restricted to as .
Sequential View: for every sequence in with for all and , we have . (And analogously for the left-sided limit with .)
Example: For :
Example: as
Consider . We claim .
Proof
Let be any sequence in such that as . We want to show that .
Pick any large positive number . We want to show for large enough.
Consider . Since implies (because is strictly increasing).
Since and , there must be an such that for all , we have .
For these , it follows that . Since was arbitrary, this means . Thus, .
Example: as for
Consider for , defined on . Then .
Reasoning: As , . Since , . Then , which we interpret as .
(Using the composite limit theorem: ).
Continuous Extension of
For , the function on has a limit of as . So, we can define a continuous extension to include :
This extended function is strictly monotonically increasing, bijective (if we consider the codomain ), and continuous on its entire domain .
Continue here: 16 Differentiation, Derivative and Rules